The UNwelcomed
Dreamers Mina Kwon
Jean Pfaelzer is professor of
English, East Asian, and American Studies at the University Delaware. She is an
expert on nineteenth-century history, culture, women¡¦s literature feminist
theory, and cultural theory. She has published four other books, worked as the
executive director of the National Labor Law Center, been appointed to the D.C.
Commission for Women, and worked for a member of Congress on immigration,
labor, and women¡¦s issues.
¡§I make no claim,
however, for my wife¡¦s insanity or the anguish I have suffered.¡¨ 1, said Lum
May, one of the many men who suffered during the Chinese expulsion during the
nineteenth century. The sad, but mythical, story started from the gold rush ¡V
the ultimate motivation for Chinese entrance into California.
Caught up in the successful stories of the New Frontier, the Chinese immigrated
to the United States.
Eventually, the white men¡¦s belief in their superiority over the Chinese, led
to heartless mass Chinese expulsion from California.
Jean Pfaelzer, in Driven Out:
The Forgotten War Against Chinese Americans, not only portrays the
exile of Chinese Americans, but also presents the confrontation from the eyes
of the marred, but determined Chinese.
In the beginning of her book, Jean Pfaelzer illustrates the settlement for the gold rush and
the beginning of ¡§ethnic cleansing¡¨ in California.
Chapter One, ¡§Gold!¡¨ starts with the time when gold
was discovered in 1848. Dreaming of wealth on ¡§Gold
Mountain¡¨, Chinese immigrated to
the United States.
However, favoring the majority, the California
government wrote a new constitution for California,
in 1849, in which the convention denied the vote to all women and Indians and
Africans, as well the right of minorities to testify against whites in court. Pfaelzer then goes on to describe, in Chapter Two, ¡§Dead Branches¡¨, how the
race war began in Shasta as white miners purged the Chinese with arms; this
eventually emptied the gold fields of Chinese miners. Hated and unwelcomed, Chinese were often called coolies¡Xa term for
kidnapped, enslaved, or indentured servants. As a sheriff testified to the
white miners in Shasta: the Chinese ¡§ought to have been able to protect
themselves, but they seem to be great cowards and [would] not fight under any circumstances¡¨2. Because of the doctrine of
states¡¦ rights, California could
bar Chinese miners from entering or settling in the state, because they
reserved the power of expelling people from their borders. Expulsion of early
Chinese immigrants stood on the legal and ideological shoulders of the Foreign
Miners¡¦ Tax law of 1850 that effectively eliminated the immigrant¡¦s rights to
sit on a jury and deposit a ballot. In 1858, with the gold rush settling down,
the Chinese seemed to enter an even greater level of expulsion and hardship.
After illustrating Chinese
settlement and expulsion, the author demonstrates the changes in policies
toward Chinese expulsion and Chinese woman. Despite the fact that they received
a seemingly unlimited source of low paid workers from China,
in 1867, early unions worked with the Democratic Party to pressure San
Francisco to pass anti-Chinese ordinances and make it
difficult for Chinese to earn a living. For instance, the Burlingame Treaty and
Fourteenth Amendment, which shielded the Chinese by granting the Chinese the
rights to file lawsuits and enjoy equal protection and due process of law, were
destroyed along with the Civil Rights Act and Page Act of 1875. Those acts
removed the right of Chinese immigrants to become citizens and banned the
immigration of most Chinese women. Hopeless and distrusted, in 1870, Chinese
eventually migrated to the northwest with dreams of finding easy gold. Some
formed their own mining companies, and some invested in hydraulic or drift
mining. However, the Democratic Party¡¦s attempt to rewrite local anti-Chinese
codes into California¡¦s second
constitution did not end. In Chapter Three, ¡§The Woman¡¦s Tale¡¨, the author also
shows interest in Chinese woman during the nineteenth century. In the 1870s,
with the serious debate about the righteousness of Chinese prostitutes, all
Chinese women were declared to be one of ¡§the most abject and satanic
conception[s] of human slavery and the source of contamination and hereditary diseases.¡¨3 Consequently, the 1875
Page Act was passed which prohibited the immigration of any Chinese woman who
was not a merchant¡¦s wife.4 As the
economic depression worsened, the alleged disease and contagion endemic to
Chinese women posed a real threat to jobs, culture and the country.
After Pfaelzer
details the Chinese expulsion, in the next two Chapters, she discusses the Eureka
and Truckee methods. In Eureka,
by the late 1870s, on-the-job actions against the Chinese became more
organized. Also, anti-Chinese feelings arose with the growing labor movement,
and in turn thrust the labor movement into political power in California.
White laborer¡¦s perception that they suffered from Chinese competition was
pervasive but flawed. Chinese workers mostly took jobs that white workers
refused. Thus, after Chinese left, the towns suffered from the loss of Chinese
laundries, shops, herbalists, and vegetable growers. As California
laborers turned to the Democratic Party, the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act
emerged, and closed the door on Chinese immigration. In addition to the plight
of the Chinese Exclusion Act, in 1886, Chinese faced another struggle with the
emergence of the call for expulsion of all Chinese from the country as the
Knights of Labor won the election. However, businessmen could not rehire
Chinese, because if they did, people would have boycotted their businesses.
Attracted to the opportunity to build the Transcontinental Railroad, the
Chinese entered Truckee, eventually making one third of
that population. It was the editor of Truckee¡¦s rural
newspaper who launched a plan that would destroy Chinese towns across the
state. The ¡§Truckee Method¡¨ expelled the Chinese by essentially starving them
out. For instance, Charles McGlashan, editor of the
Truckee Republican, set a plan to ¡§impose leadership from the better class of
citizens who would demand that all individuals, companies, and
corporations¡Kdischarge any and all Chinese man.¡¨5
He argued that Congress withdraw from the Burlingame Treaty and amend the
Exclusion Act so that Chinese persons leaving the United
States could never enter again. As Sission, Crocker, the Chinese Six Companies, and the
Central Pacific Railroad, canceled their contracts with Chinese workers,
Chinese who were expelled moved to San Francisco,
British Columbia, back to China,
or others simply made secret contracts with their employers.
Finally, as the highlight of her
book, Pfaelzer portrays the Chinese resistance. In
Chapter Seven, ¡§A Litany of Hate¡¨, by end of 1880s close to two hundred towns
in the Pacific Northwest had driven out their Chinese
residents, and hundreds of acts of Chinese resistance were suppressed or
ignored by the media. However in Chapter Eight, ¡§The Dog Tag Law¡¨, Pfaelzer shows how Chinese resistance became more evident
as ¡§thousands honored the call to disobey the ¡§Dog Tag Law,¡¨ which ¡§created
perhaps the largest organized act of civil disobedience in the United
States.¡¨6 The Geary Act and the Dog Tag Law required
the Chinese to carry around their identity cards. The law had significance in
that it finally erupted the potential anger of
Chinese; they were on the verge of losing their true identities. The Chinese
eventually brought this issue to the court case, Fong Yue
Ting. As a result, the court allowed the Chinese to be deported for failing
to register or carry identity cards, or if proper provision for payment was not
available. In response to these acts, the Chinese government eventually asked president Cleveland to give protection to the Chinese.
Consequently, Cleveland announced a
sudden halt to arrests until Congress decided whether to repeal, amend, or fund
the Geary Act. The Chinese ultimately had to follow the deadline, and those who
did not follow were imprisoned. In
1894, while there were hostilities against newly arrived Japanese workers, China
abandoned its countrymen to forge a trade agreement with the United
States. Despite Chinese resistance to an
identity card, eventually, Chinese registered for their new identification.
When the Chinese Exclusion Act was renewed in 1902, the legal gate on Chinese
immigration slammed shut for another forty years. The legal immigration of
Chinese people was over.
Pfaelzer does not only focus on the political,
social, and cultural struggles of Chinese in California
during the nineteenth century, she also focuses their brave and determined
resistance against their enemies. Pfaelzer argues
that although Chinese were treated brutality, they ¡§fiercely and tenaciously
fought for their right to live and work in the United
States.¡¨7 Starting from the gold rush, Pfaelzer clearly demonstrates how
Chinese were unwelcomed. In the beginning of the
book, to clearly reveal the ruthless expulsion of the Chinese, the author
reveals the white miners¡¦ attempts to drive out the Chinese from mining fields
throughout California. Pfaelzer, however, emphasizes and concludes her book by
revealing major lawsuits, strikes, and boycotts enacted by Chinese Americans to
show their resistance against a society that turned against them.
Pfaelzer
provides a variety of colorful and accurate facts and historical anecdotes to
support her argument. Not only does she portray the status and resistance of
the Chinese, from the gold rush to the start of the twentieth century, but she
also provides readers with a Californian history. For instance, she argues that
the California¡¦s first
constitutional convention¡¨ began the process of transforming California
from a territory into a state¡¨8 in
1849. Furthermore, the author testifies that it was hard for her to find true
information about the Chinese Americans during the nineteenth century, because
most of it was fabricated and damaged through decades of history. Though she
has a formal tone, the author seems to have compassion toward the Chinese
Americans. She has a broad point of view that not only talks about the history
of early Chinese-Americans but also about the history of Latin, Italian, and
Japanese Americans. She also provides the point of view from the United
States, as well as from China.
For example, Pfaelzer vividly reveals the two-faced
Chinese government, as she describes how China
somehow abandoned its citizens abroad for its own trading benefits with the United
States. Her variety in point of view helps
the readers to understand the hidden history easily and insightfully. Pfaelzer is New Left because she demands the inclusion of
those features of our history that explain how we came to be the violently
racist repressive of the late 1880¡¦s.
Pfaelzer¡¦s
book is highly valued by the professional critics such as Patricia Nelson
Limerick of the New York Times
who praises Pfaelzer¡¦s ¡§stride [for its] clear and
insightful passage of analysis.¡¨9 Limerick
thinks that Pfaelzer deserves the reader¡¦s attention
because of her fresh reinforcement of Chinese American history and her
implications of Chinese litigation as a model of memorable historical
interpretation. However, Limerick criticizes Pfaelzer¡¦s lack of a uniting theme in paragraphs by saying
that ¡§it gives the reader an unintended relief from an otherwise unrelenting
confrontation with human cruelty.¡¨10 She
advises that if Pfaelzer wrote her book with sharper
phrasing, clearer narrative and more thorough analysis, she would have sealed
off the reader¡¦s route of emotional escape. Additionally, Heloise of Blog Critics Magazine also praises Pfaelzer¡¦s work. Describing how Pfaelzer
argues that racism and genocide recur, Heloise claims that the book¡¦s most
valuable parallel is the ¡§undeniable intersection between emancipated black
slaves and immigrant Chinese.¡¨11 Heloise
points out that the author successfully uses various sources to support her
argument as well as ¡§meticulously and individually, [identifying] the Chinese
who were affected.¡¨12 Not only does
Heloise recognize Pfaelzer for her research ability
and depth of knowledge, but she also recognizes Pfaelzer¡¦s
influence on the world.
Pfaelzer
is, indeed, a notable literary and historical pioneer. She has great strength
and ¡§morality¡¨ to search through the hidden and shameful history of the United
States. Pfaelzer
has quick and meticulous insight that she does not only focus on the
victimization of the Chinese, but also on their braveness and righteousness to
fight back against the ¡§evil¡¨ repressors. Pfaelzer
argues that the white miners did not hate Chinese because of economic rivalry
and different skin colors, but because they ¡§saw in the Chinese their most
profound anxieties about their own identity and destiny.¡¨13
This shows that the white men did not want to see their own hardships in the
eyes of the ones whom they believed they were superior to. Also, in the
beginning of the book Pfaelzer introduces different
racial groups during the gold rush such as African Americans, Latin Americans,
and Italian Americans. The author reveals that the Chinese Americans were
actually discriminated by all races. Although Pfaelzer
excellently provides the information about the Chinese Americans during the
nineteenth century, her spontaneous structure of her argument confuses the
readers. Her writing would have been better if she had provided more clear
boundaries between the events. Overall, her work is notable and highly
recommendable as it is shown in her career as a college professor at the University
of Delaware and as shown by the
praises from her peer historians, such as Kevin Starr.
Evident in Pfaelzer¡¦s
history, eastern America
during the nineteenth century influenced California,
as it was the cause of the massive migration into California,
the beginning of western culture, and a place for the exhausted Chinese to
rest. California, before the East
entered, had diverse cultures. Chinese, though working for the white miners,
still wore queues, the long braid which was a Manchu tradition. However, such tradition of the Chinese were destroyed by the westerners
from the East who enforced ¡§the Queue Ordinance, which allowed prison wardens
to shave the heads or cut off their braids of Chinese prisoners.¡¨14
Not only did the East bring western culture, it also brought epidemics to California. Consequently, numerous people died and
forced the California government
to pay attention to health issues. The East also was a place to rest for
Californians. For instance, in 1892, when thousands of Chinese tried to escape
from the chaotic west, they moved out, ¡§seeking respite in New
England, New York, and the South.¡¨15 Places such as New
York, allowed the Chinese to leave the suffocating
and violent atmosphere in the West. Not only was eastern America
the station to regenerate and energize the Chinese-Americans, it was also the
place the Chinese Americans organize petition drives, and coordinated
diplomatic intervention.
According to Pfaelzer,
the events that occurred in California
were distinctive because they supported and provided the idea that history
recurs overtime and shows more diversity of people than the rest of the world.
In the introduction of her book, Pfaelzer argues the
¡§expulsion of the Chinese from California
towns in the nineteenth century anticipated the history of Poland
and Greece in
the 1930s and 1940s,¡¨16 when they encountered massive ethnic
disputes because of WWI and WWII. The events that occurred in California
were different from the other parts of the United
States because no matter what race the
people came from they were in equal status from the time they left their
homeland. Though there were more harsh laws for the Chinese and other
minorities that did not mean that all white men were treated well.
Additionally, California¡¦s ethnic
diversity and unique social structure makes California
different from the rest of the world. California
had people from numerous continents: Asia, Europe,
Australia, and Africa,
where as the East¡¦s racial and cultural diversity was limited. Consequently, California
ended up with a unique and globally united culture¡Xthat still exists in California.
For instance, Chinatown, which was first built in San
Francisco, became the core of Asian culture: food,
art, and performance. California
should not be considered distinct from the rest of the world because of its
uniqueness in the nineteenth century, but because of its long endurance of traditional
culture and history.
Jean Pfaelzer¡¦s Driven Out: the
Forgotten War against Chinese Americans, indeed, succeeds in providing
vivid and accurate information about a rarely discussed history, showing that
both tears and passion exist in Chinese-American history. Pfaelzer¡¦s
effort in ¡§seeking Chinese voices that tell of the Driven Out,¡¨17
should be highly praised since it broadens the perspectives of the narrow and
closed-minded historians as well as the common people. The book notably
memorializes the emergence of the heart-breaking story of the Chinese
Americans. However, Pfaelzer believes the readers
should not only view the Chinese Americans as the victims, but also as the
economic builders and the fighters for their permanent and safe settlement in
the United States.
1. Pfaelzer, Jean. Driven Out: The Forgotten War Against Chinese Americans New
York: Random 1.House, 2007
xvii.
2. Pfaelzer, Jean 36.
3. Pfaelzer, Jean 98.
4. Pfaelzer, Jean 101.
5. Pfaelzer, Jean 153.
6. Pfaelzer, Jean 291.
7. Pfaelzer, Jean xxvii.
8. Pfaelzer, Jean 24.
9. Limerick, Patricia. ¡§Witnesses to Persecution.¡¨ New York Times (July 29, 2007): July 29, 2007. July 29, 2007
<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/29/books/review/Limerick-t.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin?>
10. Limerick, Patricia.
11. Heloise, N/A. ¡§Americans by Jean Pfaelzer.¡¨ Blog Critics
Magazine 30 May 2007 <http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/05/30/193535.php>.
12. Heloise
13. Pfaelzer, Jean 166.
14. Pfaelzer, Jean 75.
15. Pfaelzer, Jean 293.
16. Pfaelzer, Jean xxix.
17. Pfaelzer, Jean xxvii.